Telekom Srbija (mts) Speed Test Benchmark Your Telekom Srbija (mts) Connection

Use our free speed test to benchmark your Telekom Srbija (mts) connection. For the most accurate results, follow our accuracy guide — ideally test over a wired Ethernet connection with other devices idle. Compare your speeds against global benchmarks and the weekly leaderboard.

Telekom Srbija (brand: mts) is the dominant state-owned telecom in Serbia, offering fiber, 5G mobile, and cable TV.

Provider Telekom Srbija (mts)
Country Serbia
Coverage Nationwide
Technologies FTTH, 5G, LTE, Cable
Founded 1997
Website https://www.mts.rs

Average Telekom Srbija (mts) Speed Test Results

Typical measured results across real users. See the full leaderboard for live benchmarks.

Metric Typical Value
Download Speed up to 1 Gbps
Upload Speed up to 1 Gbps

Results are community-sourced estimates. Your speed depends on your plan, location, and equipment. Learn about our methodology →

Telekom Srbija (mts) Internet Plans and Speeds

How to Run a Telekom Srbija (mts) Speed Test

  1. Connect via Ethernet — For the most accurate baseline, connect your device directly to your router or modem with an Ethernet cable. Wi-Fi introduces variables that can mask your true plan speed. See our accuracy guide for full tips.
  2. Close background apps — Pause streaming, downloads, and backups. Other devices on your network also consume bandwidth.
  3. Start the speed test — Click GO on our homepage. The test measures download, upload, ping, and jitter in about 30 seconds.
  4. Compare your result — Check your measured speeds against the typical Telekom Srbija (mts) results above. If you're significantly below your plan speed, review the common issues section below or contact Telekom Srbija (mts) support.

Telekom Srbija (mts) Pros and Cons

Pros

  • Largest network coverage
  • Aggressive fiber rollout
  • Good speeds

Cons

  • State-owned — customer service can be slow
  • Higher prices in rural areas

More ISP Speed Tests

View All ISPs →

Something outdated or incorrect on this page?